SOFT CAT.ai
FIND SOMETHING USEFUL
← Thoughts & corrections

THE EDITORIAL REVIEW / 13 SEPTEMBER 2026

Publishing more
was not making it better.

We removed 117 earlier essays from the site's reading collection. Their old URLs now explain the decision and link to the preserved source.

WHAT WE REMOVED

114 automated essays.
3 early opinions.

The automated series was written from news feeds, but the old generator instruction explicitly said:

“No links to sources (this is an opinion piece, not a digest)”

All 114 bot essays in this review had no external source links in their published text. Repeated “just changed everything” framing gave narrow developments a much larger meaning. Some pieces attached percentages to those conclusions without naming a model, task set or measurement.

The three early opinions had separate problems: unsupported model comparisons, untested prompting claims and reliability numbers without a recorded basis.

Keep the history. Remove the claim from circulation.

This is an editorial retirement, not a finding that every sentence was false. We no longer recommend these essays as explanations of the subjects they cover.

The complete earlier text remains at an exact Git revision. Original titles and publication dates are listed below. The old page addresses carry a retirement notice, and the essays no longer appear in site search, feeds, tags or related reading. Retirement notices are excluded from the sitemap and ask search engines not to index them.

The correction record keeps pieces where a narrower, useful article could be recovered. The launch article remains as corrected project history. The notebook records documented work.

The thought writer now proposes sourced drafts for editorial review. A source link still needs checking. The separate server's current state is unverified, so this source change does not establish that its old job has restarted.

The removal record

117 essays · original dates retained
July 20261 essay
June 202619 essays
May 202629 essays
April 202630 essays
March 202630 essays
February 20268 essays

Prompt engineering is already dying

The essay claimed that different prompting approaches produced the same result without a test or source. It also blurred the distinction between asking for structured output and checking that the output satisfies a schema.

Preserved source ↗

Inspect the machine-readable record, source revisions and blob hashes ↗